mirror of
https://github.com/got-feedBack/feedBack.git
synced 2026-08-15 13:17:25 +00:00
293dc86d83
Post-merge Codex review of E3 (PR #522) flagged two GP5 edge cases: - P2: enrichment applied the diagram's name/fingers to the played template without checking the diagram described the voicing actually played. A mismatched chord label/diagram could mis-name/finger the played template, and the back-fill spread it to other strums of the same played pattern. Now gated on an exact, full-span fret-pattern match (new _chord_diagram_frets), mirroring the GP8 guard — and comparing over max(played width, num_strings) so a 7/8-string diagram can't falsely match a narrower played voicing. - P3: name and fingers back-fill were coupled (a name-only first annotation blocked a later beat's fingers). Now independent. Codex re-reviewed twice (the first match-gate trimmed extended strings; fixed by the full-span compare); final pass clean. +4 tests (mismatch-not-applied, name-then-fingers decoupled, higher-position absolute match, 7-string extended string regression). 163 GP tests pass. Follow-up to #522. Part of got-feedback/feedback#334. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>